Saturday, June 14, 2008

Marketing Models for India

Earthworm, Snail, Porcupine and Co.

By Harish Bijoor

Competition is a reality. None of us can ignore competition. There is competition in the home, in the school, in college, in office and most certainly in the great Indian market-place as a whole.

If there is life, there is competition. The baby in the house competes for your attention, just as that brand new hair gel on the shelf is seeking out your attention amidst a clutter of competition weighing down the super-market shelf.

How does one really compete? Let me paint four models.

If I am to look around the nations of the world and correlate competitive models in current use, there are four distinct patterns that emerge. Four clusters that have whole sets of nations congregating in models those seem to work for each of them differently and with different levels of efficacy. Needless to say, the peculiarities of each nation in question dictate the distinct choice they have made for themselves. Let’s visit the clusters. And let’s call them all kinds of animal names.

1. The Earthworm Model:

The passive model of competitive reaction. The invitation theory that is best practiced by the earthworm. A rich worm really. It knows the basics best. It is in constant touch with the earth that it seeks nourishment from and nourishes back simultaneously. A fundamentally strong being.

Several problems in this model though. It is passive for one. Non-reactionary. A model in the self-fulfilling prophecy mode. The best example of the fatalistic theory of the East in practice. When faced with danger, all it can do is continue its humble journey in the earth. Competition kills this model with ease. There is no reaction. The fatalistic model of competition at its best!

Is the Indian marketer here? I

2.The Snail model:

The common competitive model in practice by a whole host of nations. This model is reactively proactive. A clear cocoon orientation. When faced with competition and danger, there is a regression into the shell. The withdrawn marketer at play. The philosopher marketer even! The marketer who revels in the safety-static nexus. Waiting for the competition to just go away, so that normal life may resume again!

Is India here?

3. The Porcupine Model:

This model tells the competitor clearly of the array of weapons that are available for retributive action. There is a clear emphasis on the display of the arsenal. It believes in the overt display. A clear d├ętente model of competition. Avoids a lot of speculative action and is ready for the real battle

Many marketers seem here.

4. The Everyone Else Model:

This is the model of the real-time player in competitive markets of the present and certainly the future. This is the real-time marketer. Reactive when necessary. Proactive when necessary. Guerilla in tactics when necessary as well!

This is a constant-change oriented model that believes in watching the scenario carefully and reacting accordingly. Making forays into proactive territory on a speculative basis. Never mind if even only one of those sixteen forays actually click! Life in the fast track of competitive marketing is pretty un-predictable and speculative. Change here is absolutely discontinuous. Making a decision on a point of competitive strategy based on happenings of the past and the present could be disastrous. The future never ever happens the way the past decided.

Change here is so discontinuous that it is aptly illustrated by the example of the baby-arrival process in the house. The first child in this baby-boomers house is born out of a Caesarian section, gone in for by an over-zealous gynecologist. The second baby of the house is therefore predictably to be one out of a similar process. Caesarian section! No! It isn’t. Change is discontinuous. The second baby is a natural birth! The third child is due to happen then. This time round, its Caesarian section as well! Oops!

The fourth child of this baby-happy home is due. Change is indeed discontinuous. There is no predictability here. Guess what! This time round, the baby is actually conceived, carried and delivered by the father of the baby! Oops! Again! Change is indeed that discontinuous!

Shouldn’t India be here?

The author is a brand-strategy specialist & CEO, Harish Bijoor Consults Inc.

Email: harishbijoor@hotmail.com

4 comments:

Tejidner Kainth said...

Hi Harish,

Your post is interesting. I strongly feel that in India only few industries have seriously put resources for branding strategies. In the emerging market such as India still in each category there are brands which can be differentiated with quality but in the west where the markets are mature and consumers are highly knowledgeable about quality , almost all brand offers more or less good quality. I this type of scenario branding come in picture and become a critical success factor. I think forward looking firms in India should work in the direction of brand building and create a base of “Brand Loyalists", where consumers resonate with brand.

Tejinder Kainth
tejinder_singh99@yahoo.com
Marketing Strategist,Toronto,Canada

Kalumangi Srivatsa said...

Respected sir,
It is really a wonderful artical to understand the relativity and reactivity of Indian marketers with special referance to branding,
I strongly feel Branding or any marketing aspect has to have a direct relationship with the dynamics of the market, specially in the current scenario of 'White Water' situation where the only thing which is for constant is 'Change'. I feel brands are not exempted from this phenomenon too. As your earlier articals and posts regarding "The Brand Trends" do emphasize that brands have the tendancy to change.Hence Indian marketers could be distributed in all four models and tend metamorphosize to different other forms.

I would like to conclude my opinion with the understanding from the artical that "Managerial decisions and management concepts originate and evolve from situations"

With regards
Kalumangi Srivatsa
Student,Indian Business Academy,
Bangalore.

Raleigh said...

Lara began his cricket career while at school in Fatima College. When he was 14, he played in the under-16 and First Divisions of national schoolboys' cricket. He amassed 745 runs in the schoolboys' league that year at an astounding average of 126.16 per innings. Immediately afterwards he was selected for the Trinidad national under-16 team.

clickhere to know more details about BRIAN LARA

Anonymous said...

Willingly I accept. The theme is interesting, I will take part in discussion. I know, that together we can come to a right answer.